«

Double Standards for DUI – How to justify them?

May 20, 2010
Author: Chris M. Alexander

There are many complaints from drivers all over the United States about the non-existence of a level playing field when it comes to DUI. From the analysis conducted by various concerned groups, we see that some individuals seem to be above the law and can commit any amount of DUI without ever being prosecuted. Their findings were based on investigative work done by several lawyers and include:

Friends in the DA Office

The case of Randy Saavedra: Randy Saavedra, a director of the administrative office of New Mexico and son of State Rep. Henry Saacedra was pulled over on suspicion of DUI. This is not the strange part. He has vowed to fight the case based on a peculiar turn of events during his encounter with his arresting officer.

When Mr. Saavedra was pulled over on suspicion of DUI and was given a breathalyzer test, he blew a 0.08 that would qualify him as legally drunk. The officer also stated that he had bloodshot eyes, slurred speech and a smell of alcohol. However, someone somewhere decided that the machine must be defective so a second breathalyzer test must be given. This time he blew a 0.07. Now tell me, who gets a second chance at a breathalyzer test. It shows it pays to have good friends in the DA’s office.

Benefits of being a Cop

When civilians are convicted due to DUIs, they receive various forms of punishment such as loss of driver’s license, fines or jail time. However, we do not see this same attitude transferred to cops, the protectors of the state.

A study conducted in the state of New York revealed that of some 55 cops charged with drunk driving, almost all of them were allowed to remain on the job. This was so although the New York police Department has the power to fire cops who cause serious injury to another individual or is deemed unfit for duty due to the consumption of alcohol. What they saw was that these DUI cops were offered the opportunity to plead to a lesser charge such as driving while impaired or simple disorderly conduct.

Sports Coaches get preferential treatment

Coaches are supposed to be a beacon of positive example for the athletes under their charge. However, not all coaches seem to have read the script. We look at the case of Sacramento’s rookie coach Eric Musselman who was pulled over by a cop for making a right turn from a left lane and cutting off another motorist.

When confronted by the cop, he failed three field-sobriety tests and actually blew a .11 during his breathalyzer test (legal limit 0.8).No sanctions were levied against him. This left me thinking to myself, what if it were one of his players, how would he deal with the situation. Would he be suspended, given extra workouts, ordered to counseling? For peace of mind, I settled with the thought that the guys in the suit are given more latitude than the ones who sweat.

Friends, what do you think of double standard DUI laws; do share your experiences and thoughts with us.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 20th, 2010 at 2:20 am and is filed under DWI Laws, DWI cases, Drunk Driving . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Double Standards for DUI – How to justify them?”
  • Therran Oliphant Says: May 20th, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    Nice post. The Man continues to suck it hard.

    I would only change the fact that 0.08 is the legal limit and not 0.8. Death is the only thing happening to someone who is a 0.8 alcohol saturation level in their blood.

  • Chris M. Alexander Says: May 20th, 2010 at 11:56 pm

    @ Therran Thanks for the comment and also for correcting us, we really appreciate it & made correction too. Keep visiting DWI Blog and help us in making a better society for everyone.

  • Dewie Says: February 24th, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    I work at a DUI program in CA and see many people who say they were stopped once or twice and let go for one reason or another. They go on to drink and drive again and eventually get caught, convicted, fined and required to go to DUI school. I don’t think it’s a double standard – people with money do get away with more than the average person. But they don’t get away with it forever – it may take longer but everyone eventually get their rightful consequences.

Leave a Reply








RSS
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
 
DWI Quiz
Find a lawyer!