Driving under the influence of alcohol is a major scourge on America’s streets. Too often, we see major accidents leading to fatalities resulting from drunk driving. The matter is even worse among the celebrity community who a constantly been looked up to maintain high standards and set examples for the rest of society to follow. As a result, when they run afoul of the law due to dumb offences such as drunk driving it creates intense outrage among the populous and even higher disappointment.

Popeye Jones Busted for DUI

Popeye Jones is yet another and joins the long list of prominent figures to be busted on charges of DUI. A mug shot of Popeye Jones was released on the internet showing him with a busted up face with signs of battering on his forehead, cheek and lips after he was forcibly taken into custody for resisting arrest.

It is alleged that Popeye Jones was pulled over on the suspicion of driving while intoxicated. This was after several motorists complained to the Richardson Police Department that there was someone driving a GMC Yukon in an unusually reckless manner. Upon the request of the investigating officer for a breathalyzer test, Popeye subsequently refused and a minor scuffle ensued between himself, a six foot-eight former ex-power forward and the arresting officer. As a result, Popeye Jones received various damages to his face while being brought down by the officer.

Conflicting stories on Popeye Jones DUI Arrest

There is no doubt about the events leading up to Popeye Jones being pulled over. Eyewitnesses alerted the police to the erratic style of his driving. Actually, they had no clue as who was behind the wheels of the GMC Yukon. Where it becomes cloudy, is in the sequence of events after he was pulled over. There were no witnesses present, so prosecutors have to go off the report submitted by the arresting officer. However, many commentators are asking if Popeye Jones case was a case of resisting arrest or one of excessive force being used because of his ethnicity. The truth will come out in when the evidence is revealed from the arresting officer’s in-car dashboard camera.

Reaction to Popeye Jones DUI Arrest

With his high status among the basketball community, there is bound to be some backlash to Popeye Jones dui arrest. We can already hear his critics saying that he should know better or that he should be given some form of punishment for putting a bad light on the sport. Many are waiting of comments from the owner of his Mavericks team Mark Cuban, who is yet to comment on the issue. Instead, he chose to hit out on those who alerted the police by asking why they care, because he is sure, they do not report every DWI case the see in Texas.

In the wake of realizing the serious consequences of drunken driving offences, several measures are being taken both the government and private agencies to curb the incidence of drinking and driving accidents. One such measure is the introduction of Ignition Locks in vehicles that will not allow the vehicle to start where the driver tests alcohol in his breathe.

Ignition Locks Mandate for First Time DWI Offenders

Have you ever been convicted under a DWI charge? There are 8 states in the nation that have mandated the fixing of ignition locks in the vehicles of those who have been convicted under DWI charge even once. Usage of ignition locking devices is seen more as a preventive measure than a penalty imposition.


By mandating the fixing of Ignition locks in the vehicles, it amounts to the cars preventing the driver from driving it when he/she is under the influence of alcohol. States namely Nebraska, Illinois, Alaska, Washington and Colorado have joined the bandwagon of mandating Ignition locking devices in the vehicles of those who have been convicted under the DWI legalities even once. Arizona, Louisiana and New Mexico are the first three states to introduce this mandate, out of which New Mexico is the first state to introduce this rule in early 2005. With the current count of states mandating ignition locks increasing to 8, even first time offenders are required to fix an ignition locking device in their vehicle in these 8 states.


A few organizations especially the liquor industry has expressed its opposition to the introduction of mandatory ignition locks in the vehicles. According to the American Beverage Institute (ABI), inspite of their support to the usage of ignition devices for repeat offenders, first time offender rule was not in consensus with them. According to Sarah Longwell of ABI the freedom of having a sip of wine or champagne at a party or wedding is being greatly restricted because of this rule.

Reduced DWI Fatal Accidents

Considering the fact that ignition interlock devices are rarely prescribed by the law, many organizations especially MADD have been demanding for introducing ignition locks even for the first time offenders and have so far been successful in 8 states across the nation.


The state of South Carolina has introduced mandate of ignition lock devices for repeat DWI offenders. It is the only state in the nation that has introduced the mandate for repeat offenders.


Ignition Lock Devices have been successful in reducing the chances of fatal DWI accidents thereby curbing the bane of drunken driving right at its inception. There is a 20% drop in the number of DWI deaths in the country with the help of ignition lock devices.


Sometimes we are left with limited options to curb the growing menace of DWI accidents and ignition lock devices is one such effective instrument to stop drunken driving accidents right in the beginning. If you disagree with this view point write to us with reasoning.